Another year, another CSI title arrives. Not much new about that… or is there? Actually, this time there is, as for the first time in the history of the popular franchise, CSI: NY has taken the franchise along the casual route instead of offering up a full-fledged adventure. Is it a detour worth taking? That depends at least in part on whether you know where it leads. (Fortunately, after reading this, you will.)

In some ways, the first CSI game based on the New York spin-off series has become its own worst enemy. For reasons unknown (but easily speculated), Ubisoft simply… neglected to mention in any of the advance materials that the game is a casual title. Who knew that phrases like “more user-friendly interface” and “improved gameplay” actually meant “strategically streamlined for casual audiences”? While always veering towards rather lightweight adventuring fare, the five previous CSI installments have nevertheless fallen squarely within traditional genre boundaries, with the freedom to explore crime scenes, request warrants, and search for clues that actually relate to the cases at hand. And with word that Legacy Interactive was at the helm of the new iteration, there was reason to believe that the former developers of the Law & Order games would bring a refreshing approach backed by proven experience.

They did that, all right, but the experience came more from their recent work on other casual titles like The Lost Cases of Sherlock Holmes than their older adventure series. Is that a bad thing? As it turns out, no it isn’t, but it’s likely to be a BIG disappointment and major point of contention to any that play the game with false expectations going in. With the correct ones, however, there’s actually a reasonable amount to like about CSI: NY.

Aside from the whole totally-unexpected-genre thing, the most obvious difference in the new game is the move to New York. Past games have featured the Vegas and Miami casts, but now the series has finally landed in the Big Apple. All the key characters from the television show lend their likenesses and voices to the game, from Gary Sinise to Melina Kanakaredes, Carmine Giovinazzo, and Eddie Cahill, to name just a few. Aside from a few wooden deliveries (bored indifference to unearthing a dead body probably isn’t the way to go) and consistently over-acted confessions, the voice work is generally good from both lead and supporting cast alike.

The fact that players get to directly control detectives Mac Taylor (Sinise) and Stella Bonasera (Kanakaredes) instead of an anonymous CSI rookie was highly trumpeted before release, but actually has little impact on the game, which plays out in first-person. In fact, you’ll see them more often when you’re playing as the other, as they show up to make helpful contributions to your investigation. The rest of the cast similarly turns up as you proceed through each case with visits to the morgue and crime lab, creating a solid connection with the show.

Where a disconnect may begin to occur is in the game’s art style. Rather than the attempted realism of earlier games, CSI: NY opts for a distinctly hand-drawn graphic novel look. It’s not unattractive, though it’s a little heavy-handed in its bold black outlines. But at the very least, it is a huge change for the series and may be an acquired taste. It also doesn’t do much justice to the static character portraits. While modeled after the program’s actors, the likenesses aren’t overly precise. If not for the accompanying voice work and context, I might not have been able to place them. Where the new style clearly bombs out is in the city transitions between locations. As this mimics the show more than anything, it stands out in its striking inability to resemble its TV counterpart.

You’ll be getting many good, long looks at the artwork, too, as one of the central components of the game is its “hidden object” gameplay, though it’s handled quite differently than most games carrying that label. Indeed, CSI: NY offers way more different game elements than most seek-and-find titles, but even so, you’ll do a fair bit of random object collecting, although the pretense of doing “detective work” is more forgiving in that respect. Locations are often fairly generic, displaying the likes of offices, homes, and restaurants, with an occasional welcome trip to the Empire State Building lobby and the circus thrown into the mix. Naturally, these areas are filled with lots of excess items, but they’re generally limited to suitable objects in context.

In a rather bizarre move, however, the game opts to present you not with a written list of objects to find, but graphical images of them. In some cases, this makes the exercise as easy as it sounds, removing the challenge of not knowing the particular depiction of the objects in question. To address this imbalance, the picture list begins blank and only slowly starts to fade into full focus. I suppose the point is to encourage players to think about what items to look for, but in practice it’s a pointless waste of time. Like most hidden object games, there isn’t much rhyme or reason for the items you’re looking for, at least any that you know about ahead of time. So either you simply click random items early and hope that you’re right, or wait for the pictures to appear and then locate their environmental counterparts. There’s no time limit, so neither solution seems to have any unwelcome repercussions. If you’re really stuck, there are hints available, but it’s unlikely you’ll ever use one unless for the odd nondescript item that’s hard to distinguish even from its picture.